Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petupia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Petupia[edit]

Delete - I read through some of the copyright stuff and I couldn't find anything directly addressing the notion of including text while asserting "all rights reserved" as this article does. If there's something else besides a regular AfD that needs to be done, point me toward it. Regardless, the article is trivia, non-notable and without independent verifiable sourcing so it needs to go. Otto4711 20:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as phrase/term used by that site and a handful of blogs; couldn't find any 3rd party coverage of this (maybe neologism?) in the c. 50 ghits that weren't wiki-mirrors. SkierRMH 20:59, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article lists it's self as a sub topic off of the main article Fantasy world but the word Petupia is not even on the main article. Fails WP:N significantly. Jeepday 01:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, copyvio if nothing else and see also Otto4711. Stifle (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per above. Vassyana 12:25, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.